Terese Svoboda’s Wild Tongue: A Review of Trailer Girl and Weapons Grade

Trailer Girl works. Against all odds, it works. I hesitated reading the book, afraid I would only find a laundry list of trailer park cliches. Instead I found myself in a world of poetry and mystery. Imagine T.S. Eliot writing a Nancy Drew novel and then add Tennessee Williams’s empathic powers and you have Trailer Girl. The book possessed me. I stay up all night and then was left haunted by the language and stories of Trailer Girl.

In the title story, Terese Svoboda portrays the “crazy” cleaning lady as the only person sane enough to nourish the community. The schizophrenic protagonist hides food for a “wild girl” she claims lives in the cow field. This “wild girl” becomes emblematic of the abuse found throughout the trailer-park. Cleaning Lady admits, “So some of the court could have seen me gather the bright peels, just as they could have seen the way the man looked so hungry at those children. But I doubt it.” No one but Cleaning Lady can see this “wild girl.”

Terese Svoboda also gives voice to the voiceless. The Cleaning Lady explains, “What the hand does is nothing compared to the tongue, I say. A wild tongue, I say, is what no one forgives.” The “wild tongue” is Svoboda’s gift to her readers. This collection speaks for   forgotten Americans, “lost” Americans. Trailer Girl is an important book that should not be overlooked. Svoboda’s “wild tongue” lights a fire that illuminates unique truths and rages for justice.

Weapons Grade is a book of pulse. The four sections of the book, while distinct in content and voice, remain connected. Weapons Grade explores war in the world, the sexual, the family, and the self. The collection ambushes the reader. There are poems so stark it seems the collection will not be able to come together, but at the book’s finish the reader is left with a lasting impression of war in all of its manifestations. Everything is related and is of a substance pure enough to make weapons.

Svoboda is able to align war zones with the domestic. In the poem “Secret Executions of Black GIs in Occupied Japan,” the image of a noose is treated metaphorically when Svoboda writes, “– the baby’s O / mouth spread for egg.” The poem ends with the lines “We wear the mask of the guy who did it– / the present,” and finally, the idea of the noose converges with the shape of a human face. The executioner and executed both fit into the space of the O; the O, a sound that conjures both the elation of orgasm and the torment of pain.

There are poems in this collection that use language to transport the reader to complex places. In the poem, “To My Brother, On the Occasion of His Second Breakdown,” Svoboda writes, “The fury and majesty of a mind’s death / I can’t watch enough of.” There is, in these words, a refusal to offer testimony.   This same refusal to testify is seen in the poem “For They Know Not What They Do,” where Svoboda writes:

Grave raincoat—shouldered people
With their own histories, bad
Histories, drink to their bitterness
And chide us for our efforts
What is there other than I forget?

It is with lines such as these that Terese Svoboda establishes herself as a poet of witness. She offers all that words can give and then surrenders to the terrifying realization that there are occasions that leave even a poet wordless.

Nicelle Davis lives in Southern California with her husband James and their son J.J. Her poems are forthcoming in Caesura, FuseLit, Illya’s Honey, Moulin, The New York Quarterly, Redcations, and Transcurrent. She’d like to acknowledge her poetry family at the University of California, Riverside and Antelope Valley Community College. She runs a free online poetry workshop at: http://nicelledavis.wordpress.com/.

This Modern Writer: Todd Keisling, DIY

“Oh, you’re a writer, huh?  Where are you published?”

I was asked this question last week.  I’d ventured into the employee lounge to get another cup of coffee when a coworker walked in. The conversation which followed was typical and light, going from the happenings on CNN to the weather and, finally, to my plans for the weekend.

“I’m going to work on my next novel,” I told him.

The coworker seemed startled at first.  A writer?  Here? The reaction is usually the same. People in the workplace don’t expect to find a writer in the wild.

I like to imagine my writer-self as a kind of secret identity.  I work from 8 to 5 every day, then return home where I take off my normal person hat, and put on my writer hat.  Most people who know me also know about this identity, so I suppose it’s not so secret.  On the other hand, the folks with whom I have limited interaction every working day haven’t the slightest clue, and sometimes I prefer that.  It prevents the interrogatives.

Continue reading

This Modern Writer: Ethel Rohan, Potatoes

If you don’t know Sean Lovelace is in love with nachos, where are you? His obsession is bordering on perverse. Someone stage an intervention. What you can’t know is that I share a similar, but more restrained, passion. A fixation that also maketh my stomach spilleth over: the potato. How sadly stereotypical, an Irish cailan and her praita, but it’s true. I am in love with potatoes. I have eaten a potato every day since the tender age of six months. I will take my potatoes any way and in alarming portions: boiled, mashed, baked, roasted, fried, au-gratin, deep-fat-fried. I have never eaten a raw potato—

I do not recommend raw potatoes, too much crunch and soapy starch. Cooked potato is my comfort staple. Chocolate is my indulgence staple. My oldest daughter shares my potato fixation. My husband and youngest daughter hate potatoes. At least the teams are even. Every day, I insist on cooking too many potatoes for dinner, infuriating my husband. I don’t seem to know how to do potatoes unless the pot is full to the brim, a bad habit carried over from childhood. I grew-up in a family of eight. We were working-class and potatoes were cheap. Every day, an enormous pot packed with potatoes sat on our stove. It’s not a particularly happy memory: our hunger and greed, how awful those dried-out, white-turning-green, we-know-our-fate, potatoes looked, and yet I still love the potato. Few things (I will not expand) satisfy me more than potatoes mashed with kale cabbage, milk, butter, salt, and pepper, a traditional Irish dish we call colcannon—

Continue reading

This Modern Writer: Kelly Davio

In all that free time I have between the writing life, work life and home life (there really isn’t all that much social life), I get to squeeze in my editing life: I’m the Poetry and Book Reviews Editor at The Los Angeles Review, and I’m an Associate Poetry Editor for Fifth Wednesday Journal. Selecting work for these publications is one of my favorite tasks—just yesterday, I came across a poem in my Fifth Wednesday submissions that was so good I had to stand up and walk around for a while. There’s nothing like that kind of visceral reaction a piece of truly good writing can create, and there’s no better part of editing than discovering that kind of work.

It’s become clear to me recently, though, that a number of writers have a really different idea about what editors are doing and thinking: last week, I got an email from a very distraught submitter. He had failed to note in his initial cover letter that he’d simultaneously submitted his work. This follow-up communication was full of nearly obsequious apology. All this chest-beating and self-flaggellation over what he called his “gross oversight” freaked me out a little—we’ve always accepted simultaneous submissions, so it was really no problem. Another writer submitted his work in a file I couldn’t open. When I asked him to send them in another form, he gushed about what a wonderful change it was that I had not immediately trashed his work due to a compatibility issue (what kind of magazine editor would do that?).

It always surprises me when writers think of lit mag editors as heartless creatures, capriciously tossing people’s creative work into the recycling bin for our own inscrutable purposes. So, in the spirit of knowledge, allow me to disabuse you of a few apparantly-common fallacies about literary magazine editors (of course, I can speak only for myself and the other editors I know, but I imagine the below hold true for the vast majority of us):

Fallacy 1: We think we’re better than you because we are editors, and you are not. We scorn your work.

Reality: Editors tend to be pretty nice, pretty generous people. It’s not like editing a journal is a very glamorous job—we do a mighty hunk of work for low or no pay because we believe in the importance of showcasing good writing.   We’re giving our time and effort so that your work can be read, not because we’re power-tripping.

Fallacy 2: We’re looking for any reason to reject your writing.

Reality: We want you to succeed! When your poem starts well, we’re smiling. If it continues to be good through the middle, our hearts beat a little faster. If it ends well, too, we might just sound our barbaric yawp. We love good writing, and we want you to give it to us! But no matter how much we’re rooting for you, if the writing is flawed, we’re going to pass.

Fallacy 3: We don’t read your submissions thoroughly.

Reality: We read it all. Even if we’re pretty sure a poem is not for us, we read it. Much of the time, several editors read it. We read the poems guys write about their junk. We read homages to the writer’s cats. We read what appear to be left-aligned journal entries. We read about the flora and fauna of the American back yard. Let me repeat: we read it all.

Fallacy 4: We’re extremely concerned with your prior publications.

Reality: While it’s cool if you’ve had work in a journal we really like, it’s unlikely to influence our final decision. And nothing makes us happier than to be the first to publish a great new writer. So tell us where you’ve been before, but don’t worry if you’re still trying to break into the magazine world. It’s all about the work you’ve put in front of us.

Fallacy 5: We have no feelings.

Reality: Okay, so it’s unlikely any writers actually believe editors are devoid of human emotion, but sometimes it seems that way, especially when one responds to a rejection notice with nasty or abusive material. We’re writers, too, and know that rejection doesn’t feel great. However, it’s not personal. When writers make it personal by being unkind, well, that’s just weird. What would their mothers say?

All this is to say, go don’t be so darn scared or suspicious of editors or of the whole submissions process—just send us your best work, be nice, and we’ll consider your writing with the kind of respect we hope to have from others.

Because writers need musical inspiration

I just started following the twitterer “Indie Music Universe.”

I wanted to share with you all   http://www.independentmusicawards.com/ima_new/jukebox2009.asp

the Indie Music winners of 2009– the best of Indie Music of 2009 thus far because sometimes a little music would do your writing good.

Maybe you’re not into the Indie– but why not? Also, think about investing in an inexpensive (75$) weekend pass to the annual Indie-Music Fest “Pitchfork” which happens to be in Chicago every early summer. The lineup is still in formation, but if you click here http://www.pitchforkmusicfestival.com/, you can find out more about the concert as well as the bands Pitchfork thinks are the best of Indie http://pitchfork.com/reviews/best/.

Enjoy a break from the voices in your head. Recharge your batteries with a musical interlude…. ahh, Indie…so refreshing 😉

Wisdom of the day

Daily, a chapter of the Tao arrives in my email inbox.

Most days I don’t really read it–I just kinda skim to get the main idea.

But today I read through–I guess I needed some wisdom.

Perhaps you need some too. Hopefully this will help you during your journey through the day.

Tao te Ching
Chapter 36

That which is to be shrunk
must first be stretched out.
That which is to be weakened
must first be strengthened.
That which is to be cast down
must first be raised up.
That which is to be taken
must first be given.

There is wisdom in dimming your light.
For the soft and gentle
will overcome the hard and powerful.

Fish are best left in deep waters.
And, weapons are best kept out of sight.

funnies for a movie that “flopped”

http://www.slate.com/id/2212953/

Slate.com thought about what would happen if Woody Allen had directed “The Watchmen” which premiers in theaters today, through comic-like drawings. This is worth looking at because as so many critics have already noted, The Watchmen really sucked, kind of like how “The Spirit” sucked. Looks like director Zack Snyder can’t live up to his reputation… But since no one wants to say that explicitly, they’ll just try to find a silver lining to the loss of the 10$ they spent on a movie ticket by thinking about how much worse the film could have been. Sounds like this film is one to skip, even if my hotel in SF is near an Imax theater…

best “first-liner” contest

Through May 1st 2009, enter the “Literary Database’s” contest for the best first liner…

Enter here:

http://literarydatabase.com/contest.html

Although the winner doesn’t receive ca$h– the winner will receive a copy of “the literary database 2009”–

I love the idea of working for a great fist liner– I also love that there is a contest devoted to such an art. Best of luck!