Hazel Foster’s Summer Sunday at the Fair is a real treat in the June issue. Â She talks with us about circuses, how she watches television and the believability of that vampire guy as a male lead.
1. Why rebut Water for Elephants? And is this a rebuttal for the film or book?
I work in a library. I am often encouraged to read fiction that is not to my taste, and I very often check out suggested materials, bring them home, let them sit in a pile for a few weeks, and ultimately return them un-cracked. Water for Elephants, the book, got past this cycle. I read it. It was easy to read. Fluff in the worst way. It read like the outline of a novel, never pausing to explore scene or character. I finished it and felt disgusted afterwards, disgusted that anyone, ahem, Sara Gruen, could write such garbage, be read by so many people, and make so much money. I know, it’s a tired complaint, but I’ve never had it strike me as powerfully as it did then.
The rebuttal wasn’t intentional. I sat down to write, and it came out. I wasn’t sure what it was, but it was satisfying. When the movie was released, maybe a month after I wrote this piece, I did have a sick impulse to see it, but I resisted. From what I’ve heard, I made the correct decision.
2. What kind of circus would you create and operate?
The kind where snow cones don’t drip down the front of your shirt, and Shriners don’t dress up like clowns, and horses don’t spit foam and roll their eyes like they’re the newest breed of the undead. Not a sunshine and rainbows circus. Not a Lady Gaga corpses on stage circus. Maybe a petting zoo with controlled amounts of alcohol and sushi circus. Horrible combination, but it could be fun.
3. Why did you choose to write your rebuttal as a tour?
The choice was not a choice. It happened. It worked. I left it. I like the idea of guiding a reader’s eye in an intentional way. Fiction can often be underhanded, “look here, but don’t look there. Something’s important here, but don’t notice it.â€
4. How do you watch your television?
I’m not sure I qualify as having a television, but when I do watch one, I like to watch it with another person. I like to have the blinds open, glare permitting. I like to have a blanket over my legs and stomach, even if it means sweating. I like to have my phone cradled somewhere on my body. I like to get up during the commercials—I love commercials—and get food and pee. I like to watch television, but I don’t as much as I used to.
As a child, I ate every meal in front of it. I ate over a towel. I ate carefully so as to preserve the carpet. As an adolescent, I watched analog television on a thirteen inch that liked to turn-on, on its own, at full volume, and not turn off until I ripped the cord from the wall. It was possessed. I was terrified of it, but I still glued myself to it. At that age, I snuck shows I wasn’t allowed to watch: Angel, Sex and the City¸ Family Guy. I watched them through lines of static after my parents had gone to sleep. As a young adult, I used TV to escape, much like the girl’s parents in my story. I watched nearly every episode of Golden Girls, Gilmore Girls, and The Office. Now, I watch TV to relax in between work and writing, for the most part. Sometimes, it can be like it used to be, watching hours at a time, but only for the good stuff: True Blood, Big Love, How I Met Your Mother, Firefly.
5. Can you believe Robert Patterson as a romantic, manly lead?
Unfortunately, his name is Robert Pattinson. And, no. He is a teen idol. Nothing more. Maybe a step above Beiber and Zac Efron but just barely, and only because he was in Harry Potter. Besides that, did you see New Moon? There is nothing Hollywood-manly about that chest.
6. Who would you cast for the film adaptation of your rebuttal?
Are you saying someone is interested?