We're Gonna Lasso You Some Words To Read

Let’s kick this week off with a fine story from Shannon Peil at vis a tergo. Are you guys reading vis a tergo? It’s an interesting little magazine we would love to see more people reading. Shannon is the editor of amphibi.us which features a poem from Donal Mahoney. The circle of life.

PANK is being hosted by Artifice Magazine for a reading on October 1, at 7 pm, Book Cellar, Chicago, and something shocking is going to happen–both M. Bartley Seigel and I are reading.

Bull: Fiction for Thinking Men needs some staff to help with submissions, social networking, etc.. Details here. Think about lending them a hand. Working for a magazine is an invaluable experience and Bull is a really fine magazine.  Speaking of fine work, have you read the stories currently up there by Jensen Beach and Mel Bosworth?

In fancy, fancy time, Kathleen Rooney has an  article in Air Tran magazine and she name checks Tim Jones-Yelvington, the guest editor of our October issue.

Birkensnake 3 includes  Kate Wyer, AD Jameson,  Andrew Borgstrom, and others.

Acapella Zoo 5 includes writing from Jason Jordan, Kristine Ong Muslim, Tania Hershman, Toshiya Kamei, Mike Meginnis and others.

Over at We Who Are About to Die, Ani Smith gives us a nice  little review.

Ethel Rohan is the  featured writer in Emprise Review 16. She is also interviewed  here. Then Ethel turns the table and interviews Kirsty (Logan, of course) at Dark Sky.

Staccato Fiction  includes a story from Nick Ripatrazone this week. Nick also has work in  Abjective.

Deer, by CL Bledsoe is up this week at Staccato Fiction.

There are  words from JA Tyler in Radioactive Moat

In the September issue of Hobart, you will find a  great story from Nick Kocz.

Micah Dean Hicks tells us  How This Works in Tryst Magazine.

Solo Flight, by Sheldon Lee Compton is  featured at Metazen.

Route 9 is a new magazine out of UMass and the debut issue includes  Jensen Beach,  Gabe Durham,  Christy Crutchfield, and more.

I love Canteen and the  latest issue has an essay from Lincoln Michel.

Congratulations to Sarah Hilary who has made the  short list in the Sean O’Faolain Prize.

I hope you’re reading the great stuff Amber Sparks is throwing up at Necessary Fiction this month. You can find installments from  Anne Valente, Sal Pane, Joe Kapitan and others.

There’s a new issue of Sink Review with poetry from Elisa Gabbert and others.

In the September 2010 issue of Knee Jerk, writing from  James Tadd Adcox,  Simon Smith and a conversation with  Shane Jones.

Clutter, by David LaBounty is featured at The Criterion.

At Everyday Fiction, Powerball by Eric McKinley.

The second August issue of Foundling Review includes a poem from Kirsty Logan.

This week’s Annalemma features Eternal Love by Mark Budman.

The Serial Rapist Sitting Behind You is a Robot: A Review

I do not want to read The Serial Rapist Sitting Behind You is a Robot. The stories are uncomfortable and violent and the people in them are vicious andscreen-shot-2010-07-07-at-8-41-09-am abrupt. I would not want to be stuck in a lift with them. I would not want to sit and drink coffee with them. Any moment I expect these stories to tell me to bite the kerb, and then I will hear them raise their boots.

I don’t want to read these stories, but I have to read them. J. Bradley — that silver-tongued cad — makes me. You can stop reading, he whispers, but then you’ll never know. So I read, because I have to know. And it’s worth it. Bloody hell, it’s worth it.

Bradley’s stories are full of the most unpleasant and fascinating misanthropes I’ve met this year. They want to go back in time to convince their mothers to abort them. They have hate-sex. They say things like “I’m gonna fuck you so hard, you’re gonna have Down’s Syndrome”. But as soon as I start to edge away from them, there’s Bradley whispering in my ear again, and I have to keep my eyes on the page, and before I know what’s happening the story is over and these people are inside my brain. And they do not leave easily.

‘Just Do It’ is  an uncomfortably funny story about a child who sees a man on TV snorting cocaine off a knife:

While my mom was asleep, I grabbed the open box of baking soda from the fridge, then a teaspoon and butter knife out of the silverware drawer. Everything smelled like ozone and wet plastic after. I told my mom I cut myself from practicing shaving.

It’s my favourite story in the collection. Actually, it’s my favourite story of this whole week; perhaps even the month. It’s a perfect example of why I do not want to read this book: as the story progresses I just know something bad is going to happen, something terrible even, something that will make me squint up my eyes so I can’t read the words properly. And something horrible does happen, and the story has stuck in my head ever since. It’s that bad, and that good.

There’s a tenderness to these stories too, a wish that the things they do now will make things better for the future. A warning, a precursor. From ‘Primer’:

The bullet burrowed through the bark and into the trunk like a seed. Some day, I hope a little girl bites into one of these apples and coughs up the princess sleeping inside of her stomach.

This makes me think that maybe these people aren’t so awful after all. Maybe I could stand to have coffee with them. The lift might not even be so bad.

Each story is a fist to the jaw or a pinkie finger slipped into the cheek. Bradley’s style is perfect for the short form — it’s somehow wordy and sparse, words filling up the mouth but pared right to the bone. Some of the similes are so perfect that I have to put the book down and run them through my brain a few times (“My parents took pride how they stood like spoiled slaughterhouses”) and some just make me frown (“Cassie walked in our apartment like a transcription”), but I hadn’t read a single one before. Love or hate them, these similes are original, and the same can be said of the whole book.

I’m not promising that this book will leave you giggling into your lunch, or set up some pretty dreams before bed, or that you’ll be able to tell your partner about cute story you read.  In fact, you might not want to read The Serial Rapist Sitting Behind You is a Robot. But you have to. Trust me.

I Can Has Author Friends?: How the Internet Alters the Reader/Writer Dynamic

During my youth, I was a total comic book addict. I read four issues of Spider-Man every month along with healthy doses of the X-Men and the Dark Horse Star Wars series. But in 1994, when I was just beginning my descent into what would become a lifelong hobby, I dabbled and sampled from all the publishers. I dabbled, that is, until I discovered Kyle Rayner, the third iteration of the Green Lantern.

Let me break it down for you: Kyle Rayner was introduced by hotshot young writer Ron Marz to serve as the replacement for Hal “Highball” Jordan, a no-fear Air Force pilot as straitlaced as my grandfather and almost as old. Kyle was the exact opposite. He was young. He lived in Los Angeles.   He was an artist. He openly professed his love for Nine Inch Nails. And most importantly, he was completely unsure of himself in his new role as superhero. Ron Marz’s Green Lantern is the prototypical coming of age story dressed up in spandex and set against the backdrop of ’90s LA. It’s a series that really mattered to me.

He was kind of like Poochie, but a really badass Poochie who could fly and shoot energy beams.

He was kind of like Poochie, albeit a really badass Poochie who could fly around and shoot energy beams.

Cut to present day. I follow a bunch of comic pros on Twitter, and one of those writers is Ron Marz who still works in the industry penning a bunch of wonderful titles for Top Cow. A few days ago, Ron Marz tweeted about how his son’s JV soccer team was being cut by his school. Marz went to the principal and tried to come up with some answers and reported his findings via Twitter. I replied, curious about how old the kids were, and he answered a few of my questions and for a brief while, we chatted about youth sports. I clicked out of Twitter and went about my day, and it was only later that I thought about how fucking weird everything is.

I just talked to Ron Marz, beloved Green Lantern creator of my youth, about his son’s disbanded JV soccer team. Seriously, folks. Could we even have imagined this back in ’94? I know I couldn’t have. What this all leads to are questions about what’s happening to the relationship between readers and writers in a post-internet age. I certainly don’t have the answers, and I’m curious as to what you all think.

For an example of the type of altered dynamic I’m talking about, look no further than Tao Lin. Many writers have been dubbed “the voice of their generation”, but none before have had open Facebook profiles and such visible online presences. Sign onto Facebook. Look up Lin. He’s there. His profile is almost totally open.   Peep some photos of Lin hanging out on his couch with some buddies. How about a picture of the vegan dinner he prepared for his dog? It’s all there. On Facebook. Forever. And if you’ve never met Tao Lin but you love Richard Yates, it’s just as easy to add yourself to his close to 4,000 friend list and tell him how much you like his work yourself. He usually responds.

Obviously, old guard writers like John Irving or Joyce Carol Oates aren’t much for Facebook. But what’s going to happen in twenty years? How about thirty? What happens when it’s not just Tao Lin and a handful of other writers who completely open up their lives through Facebook, Twitter and blogs, but the entire literary community? What would have happened if Jonathan Franzen had a Facebook account and called out each and every backlash article on his wall?

Maybe nothing. Maybe I’m making way too much out of the whole internet thing, and it’s not that far removed from when readers would send fan letters to writers they admired. But I don’t think so. It feels to me like something’s changing, and to steal a page from the Tao Lin playbook, that what it means to be a “writer” and “reader” is shifting at a fundamental level as well. All I can say for certain is that 16 years ago I did not have the ability to tell Ron Marz how much I loved his Green Lantern run and get a reply within seconds.

Im living in the future so the present is my past.

I'm living in the future so the present is my past.

[Imagine Something Pithy Here to Let You Know We’re Going to Round Things Up]

Amber Sparks is the September Writer in Residence at Necessary Fiction and she’s doing something really imaginative with her tenure there. Go and check it out.

Ethel  interviews xTx and we learn where she wants her ashes scattered, among other things.

Volume 16 of Emprise Review features Alexandra Isacson, Summer Block, James Iredell, Joseph Riippi, Eric Burke, Joe Kapitan, Kirsty L0gan, Gary Moshimer, Beth Thomas, Nick Ripatrazone, Michelle Reale, and others.

In Everyday Genius, check out some words from Ryan Ridge.

At Sleep. Snort. Fuck, something from Peter Schwartz. He is joined by the man, Barry Graham, with a story you absolutely must read.

Janey Smith writes on the We Are Champion Blog about writing under fake names.

Brooklyn Veganism is the focus of a great story by Adam Moorad at Metazen. He is followed by J. Bradley who writes about things that fall apart.

Eat a Peach includes a poem from CL Bledsoe.

Kevin Catalano was a finalist in Terrain’s inaugural fiction contest.

Read Sleeker Kinky from the one, the only, THE Paula Bomer in the Electric Mayhem Review.

At Escape Into Life, more -mancy poems from Maurene Alsop.

Esque is a new magazine of poetry and other writing. The premiere issue includes poetry from Tamiko Beyer and Molly Gaudry.

In the Spilling Ink Review, Kirsty writes about Primogeniture.

There is a fine little story from Ani Smith at DOGZPLOT. She is joined by Peter Schwartz.

In the September issue of decomP, you will find poetry from Brett Elizabeth Jenkins and Matthew James Babcock.

There’s also a new issue of elimae including writing from Greg Gerke, JA Tyler, Ani Smith,Barry Graham, and more.

A new season of fiction excellence from Wigleaf begins with Joe Kapitan’s Sleepless #3.

Vanishing and Other Stories by Deborah Willis: A Review By Salvatore Pane

Deborah Willis’s debut short story collection Vanishing displays an impressive range of talents and voices. These fourteen long stories feel texturallyvanishing distinct from one another, and the book never falls into that trap that some short story collections do where each piece reads a little like the one that preceded it. Willis tackles gambling addicts who get involved in dangerous relationships with their dealers, directionless twenty-somethings struggling to navigate the slippery politics of poverty and sex, sisters dealing with the dissolution of their hippie parents’ marriage, and a deteriorating old woman who refuses to acknowledge her daughter’s statutory rape. These stories are as varied as the characters. Alice Munro provides one of the book’s most positive blurbs, and she’s a more than an appropriate choice. Willis knows not only how to represent many types of lives but also how to understand them, to inhabit them, to make their struggles whole and ripe with meaning.

Willis often writes in short, half-a-page scenes that stand in for long stretches of time. The device is played to full effect, and like Munro, she is often able to cover entire lives, a rare feat for short stories. In the titular piece, Willis follows a daughter whose father, a well-known writer, goes missing after his possible lover becomes engaged to a beautiful woman. Willis hints early on that she’s going to dart around in time, but it’s not until the story’s final pages, in which the daughter runs into her father’s lover in a grocery store years later, that we sense the effects of losing her father so early in life. Willis writes,

She wants to ask him questions. “Have you heard anything about my father?” Or, “Do you still miss him?’ But it seems ridiculous to say those things under fluorescent lights, beside shelves of microwavable popcorn and freeze-dried soup–Neither of them suggests staying in touch, and they never see each other again. Tabitha gets a job in a bookstore”¦ she settles, for a while, into this role behind the counter. And cultivates—perfectly—the sad, knowledgeable smile that customers seem to like.

Another standout is “Escape” about a gambler who begins stalking his black jack dealer, a former magician. The protagonist is newly widowedvanishinghccover, and he now spends his days in the casino growing more and more obsessed with his dealer and her ratty apartment in the poorer section of town. The story ends in an almost anti-climax, a dual sleight of hand employed by not only the magician but the author herself, at once hopeful and bitter-sweet.

Equally successful is the handful of stories dealing with twenty-somethings overcrowded into tiny apartments. Reminiscent of a few of the stories from Justin Taylor’s recent Everything Here is the Best Thing Ever, “This Other Us” focuses on a trio of two women and one man who live together, two of whom are involved romantically—Karen and Lawrence—and a third who isn’t—Lise. When the girlfriend picks up and leaves  town, the other two fall into a bizarre sexual relationship in which Lise dresses up like Karen to please Lawrence. The denouement is handled expertly. Willis writes,

‘Do you think it’s easy? Do you think I like looking like this?’ I tore off a set of fake eyelashes, dropped it, and ground it into the carpet with my toe. “It’s like I’m ripping off a layer of my own skin, Lawrence. Every single day I’m ripping off a layer of my own skin.’

“Frank” deals with similar subject matter, focusing on a poor couple living together right after graduating high school. Mike and Simmy end up babysitting a young boy of whom Mike says, “If he were my kid, I’d have named him Captain Danger.” They dress up in adults’ clothing they get for free at the dry-cleaners where Simmy works and eventually take the young boy on the train, where of course, mild disaster strikes. The stories that work do so because they reveal a surprising interiority, moments of revelation that not only feel unexpected for readers, but seem as if they were genuine surprises for the writer, as if she developed deeper understandings of her characters over the course of the writing process.

Not every piece works. A few feel a bit by-the-numbers and more like apprentice stories than fully realized worlds of fiction tangible with feeling. “The Fiance”, about a woman in a long distance relationship with her future husband, takes a predictable turn into well-trodden territory with little to make the subject matter new again. “The Weather” is told from the perspective of a farmer who lusts for his teenage daughter’s best friend. The story climaxes exactly where you expect to it with a revelation that’s been seen again and again. And due to the nature of Willis’ ability to capture the moods of so many diverse people and locations and times, the book occasionally feels directionless, as if the stories aren’t tied together thematically in any inherent way. But these types of stories are rare, and for the most part, Willis delivers a bold debut collection that signals the arrival of an already very mature writer.

When her stories really work in tandem, they recall the razor-sharp clarity and surprise of Dan Chaon’s Among the Missing, another book that like Vanishing is obsessed with absence and the methods we use of filling the holes left in our lives. What’s impressive about Willis is that like Chaon, even in her first collection knows enough to not answer the majority of the mysteries she sets up. She lets them float out and out and out, gaining a collective power that lives and breathes within Vanishing’s most powerful stories.

the unfirm line – Counting Crows

“It’s been so long since I’ve seen the ocean. Guess I should.”

The Counting Crows, ‘A Long December’

For the last 20 years of my life, I have lived very close to the ocean. Within the next 30 days, I move from San Diego to Madison, Wisconsin. Landlocked, except for the lakes. I will miss it and yearn for salt water, waves and the primal fear of being pulled beyond sight of land, the wonder of what is below.

Literary Los Angeles: The Unusual Suspects

I first met Amy Ellenburger when I was writing about arts funding and Chalk Repertory Theatre, the theater company of which Ellenburger is a founding member.   (I later blogged about Chalk Repertory and their resident playwright Ruth McKee here at PANK.)

But I only recently learned about Ellenburger’s involvement with the nonprofit arts education group The Unusual Suspects.   The Unusual Suspects offers 10-week theater arts workshops to underserved youth ages 14-18, including those in foster care and the juvenile justice system.   A typical series is divided into two parts, writing and performance.   First the students write a play together as an ensemble then do a full production of the play.

The Unusual Suspects was founded seventeen years ago by actress Laura Leigh Hughes in response to the 1992 Los Angeles riots.   Now they focus much of their attention on combating the city’s intractable problem of gang violence.   Volunteers travel to juvenile justice facilities, treatment centers, probation camps, after-school programs, and community centers to do on-site theater training.

Ellenburger came to The Unusual Suspects as a teaching artist before moving into the office as communications coordinator.

“Theater benefits [the students] on so many different levels,” Ellenburger says.   “It’s an opportunity to participate and to have a voice that they don’t necessarily have outside [and] they are also learning some life skills.   We do a lot of improv and ensemble work, and for the kids it’s a way of building up social skills, responsibility, and especially courage, because performing is scary.   And of course it develops reading and writing skills.”

“We don’t tell them what to write, it’s all generated by the kids,” she says, and the students often write about serious issues like homosexuality, drug abuse, and immigration.   These student-written productions are then attended by family members, classmates, neighbors, even rival gang members.

“They’ve written this play for their community, for their parents, for their neighbors, for their schools.   And it gives the community a chance to reflect and to see what issues these kids are bringing up.”

I contacted one of these writers, a former Narbonne High School student and Unusual Suspects alumna and intern, Mandy Archuleta.   Archuleta proudly recounts that her group was the first to do a musical, “Life on the Offbeat,” necessitating that the Unusual Suspects add an additional summer songwriting workshop to their usual programming.

“I am so passionate about this program and believe that it is such a positive and productive program for youth to be able to be involved in,” she told me over email. “I have seen it not only keep my peers out of trouble, but get some young people that have already had felonies against them or been involved with gangs or drugs out of that lifestyle.”

Archuleta says, “This is a place where troubled young people can do a positive thing with their time and feel good about themselves. It really can change lives. It has done nothing but positive things for our community. Here we were able not only to learn acting skills, but life skills as well. We learn respect, patience, and teamwork. These skills that we take from The Unusual Suspects are productive lessons and tools we will need in the real world.

“The teaching artists are just the most wonderful, inspiring, and talented people ever. They are there for us in every way possible. Not only to help us create something, but with life issues as well. They made us feel so comfortable and we were able to get life advice from them as well. They were there for us in every way possible. I love this program. It is the best way to get young people to do something positive when most of their life isn’t positive at all.”

“It really is a blessing to be able to have a place like this for troubled youth to be able to go. It is the best kind of atmosphere inside this group. You feel so safe and welcomed, it’s unbelievable,” she says.   “You come in not knowing anyone and feeling a bit uneasy, and leave with more confidence and a new respect for yourself and  the world  around you. To me, that is the best kind of success any program can accomplish.”

Hilary Ward, another Chalk Rep founding member and Unusual Suspects teaching artist, says, “I got involved with the Unusual Suspects when a teaching artist recommended me for a staged reading.  I arrived thinking that I was doing a good deed, but quickly forgot that I was doing a ‘favor’ because I was so impressed with the work the participants had produced. Since then I’ve done several more readings and then eventually started working as a teaching artist at Camp David Gonzales in Calabasas. What I especially love about Unusual Suspects is that it really is all about the guys: their thoughts, their experiences, their voices, their choices.  They are given the opportunity to express themselves in a safe place and actually be kids again.”

The Unusual Suspects is always looking for donations, supplies, and volunteers, but one of the simplest and most enjoyable ways to help is just to sit in the audience.

Ellenburger says, “Come see a show — it’s the easiest the volunteer opportunity you will ever have in your life—it’s two hours of your time, you get there, see the show, and enjoy it, and cheer them on.”

What Do You Want Your Writing To Be Like?

One of the best readings I saw at AWP 2010 was the Black Warrior Review/Blue Hour Press event. I spent much of the conference in a drunken haze, and to be brutally honest, I don’t really remember a ton of what I listened to over those four self-destructive days (and nights!) spent in the mountains of Denver. What stands out to me most from the readings five months later is the work of a BWR poet. The gist of Chloe Cooper Jones’ reading involved a long poem where each new line began with “I want my writing to be like…” Then she’d follow that up with something funny, but actually pertinent to writing (for example, she told us how much she wanted her writing to be like the first time you saw Mike Tyson as a child, when you thought this boxer had been sent from above to devour the world).

Something about this exercise, of identifying and naming the aesthetic effect you want your writing to achieve, really stuck with me over these last few months. And that’s especially impressive considering the fact that this reading happened during happy hour AND a Rockies game which meant a lot of frat boys hooting and hollering whenever a “lady poet” spoke the word “penis” into the mic. But I think this is a valuable exercise for all writers, and I thought I’d share with you what I want my writing to be like and then you can share yours in the comments section below. What say you, PANK readers, you down?

Ok. I want my writing to be like Short Round and Mola Ram in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. Short Round comes onscreen. He’s light, funny, charming, so full of energy. And although you’re pretty cynical, you find yourself laughing at his antics. Yeah, you think, yeah, this kid is pretty funny. But at the same time you’re slightly uncomfortable. Is it ok to laugh at Short Round? Is this kid just a late-20th century redo of   earlier racist stereotypes? Whatever. You let it slide. You enjoy the moment. Then WHAM! Out of nowhere, here’s Mola Ram and he’s ripping out your fucking heart. You didn’t sign up for this shit. You thought Temple of Doom was going to be all giggles and good times. You did not expect to have your heart ripped out and broken right in front of your eyes. This one-two punch of uncomfortable humor and abject terror/heartbreak, that’s what I want my writing to be like.

This is kind of what Im going for in all my stories.

This is the effect I'm going for in all my stories.

So what about you guys? Do you ever consciously think about your aesthetic and the effects you want your work to have on readers? If so, please share your ideas. If not, why? Are you afraid that actively thinking about the circuitry beneath your writing would be akin to plunging sticky fingers into your chest and ripping the beating black heart of your writing out into the cold natural world (see how I brought that heart shit back)?

Salvatore Pane has been nominated for the Pushcart Prize and has work published, or forthcoming, in Annalemma, PANK Quick Fiction, Weave and others. He blogs at www.salvatore-pane.com.

Museum Appetite 7: Video Installations and Reality Television

I have visited San Francisco three times since moving to Los Angeles; the first two trips were lost time in terms of museum-hopping, but last weekend I spent one day absolutely alone in a semi-familiar city.   Naturally, I sought out the most interesting San Francisco museum I could find on the internet: The Museum of Vibrators.   When I arrived at the address I hastily researched online, I found the museum had been replaced by a Buffalo Exchange.   Disappointed beyond words, I took a train downtown to my consolation museum, the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art.

Bypassing an exhibit called “Calder to Warhol,” I found my way to a video installation called “Squeeze” by Mika Rottenberg.   The piece is only twenty minutes long, but I spent thirty-five minutes in the crowded (but not uncomfortably so) dark room that housed the video, after making my way through a twisted passage constructed in the gallery by the artist — as the pamphlet about the exhibit informed me: “[Rottenberg] constructs the sculptural environment in which the video will be installed.”

As I sat on a raised ledge, the seating area of the “sculptural environment,” I watched documentary footage of female workers on in a rubber plant in India and a lettuce farm in Arizona mixed with scenes of female workers in a fictional factory, a mechanized moving set Rottenberg built in her studio.   The video follows a fictional narrative of a factory powered by the psychic abilities of a mystic; the product created by the factory is a cube made of rubber, decaying lettuce, and blush, chopped and squished into shape to create an “art object.”

The work comments on feminism, race, and the relationship between art and commerce — all topics which I don’t have the time or the appropriate context to discuss fully — while affecting a tone that reminded me of a surrealist sci-fi film.   The installation also reminded me of the Food Network television show Unwrapped.

Unwrapped shows the back-stage of how certain mass-produced food items are made.   I haven’t seen every episode in the series’ 22 season run but my favorite episodes involve some kind of large mechanized factory system, making hundred of units of my different kinds of candy, like Sour Warheads or Dum Dum lollypops.   As I watched Rottenberg’s film for a second time, I started thinking of “Squeeze” as a sort of high-art version of Unwrapped.   I mentally lifted Unwrapped‘s metered narration, squished it around in my head until it sounded like a retro-futurist robot reading a surrealist text, and placed it over Rottenberg’s visuals.

I don’t think my association between the reality television show and the video art installation is an unfair one; Rottenberg is appropriating the same kind of visuals that Unwrapped uses to make the viewer think about the implication of those visuals.   My association with the glorification of mass-production was her point, even if she didn’t predict the association would be filtered through a reality television show.   I don’t think Rottenberg started filming “Squeeze” with the intention of providing a political commentary to Unwrapped, but that’s what she’s done.

Catie Disabato lives 381 miles from the San Fransisco Museum of Contemporary Art.   She has written essays and conducted interviews for The Millions and The Rumpus and writes about music for Venus Zine.

What I Love About YOU

Nuala Ni­ Chonchoir’s debut novel, You, is set in 1980 Dublin against the charged backdrop of the River Liffey. The novel tells the turbulent story of a ten-year-old girl and her broken family. Narrated through the child’s point of view and told in the second person, this novel uses plain prose, vivid detail, fresh images, and the delightful Dublin vernacular. You is a compelling story that brings to life complex characters and delivers hard-hitting truths.

At the novel’s opening, the narrator’s single mother, Joan, attempts suicide and is admitted to a psychiatric hospital. Even after her discharge and return home, Joan remains depressed, abuses alcohol and, to varying degrees, neglects her three children. Joan also has a sinister love interest, Kit, and he and the novel’s plucky narrator often collide. Indeed one of my favorite scenes comes early in the novel when the narrator innocently walks in on Kit in the bathroom. Several terrible moments pass where Kit remains exposed and relishes, insists on, her seeing him. This moment reveals volumes about both Kit and the child and is expertly and economically handled by Ni­ Chonchair.

Perhaps what I most admired and appreciated about this novel and Ni Chonchair’s great skill set is the enormous restraint she employs, particularly around the novel’s central tragedy and her portrayal of the narrator’s mother, Joan. These characters are fully and compassionately drawn and cannot be easily judged or condemned. More, Ni Chonchair deftly employs humor throughout and achieves great pathos in what is at times a deeply troubling tale. Issues of death, suicide, mental illness, neglect, abuse, alcoholism, and brokenness are central to this novel.

You brought back so many memories of my Dublin childhood in the 80’s, everything from something as small as the orange cellophane wrapping on Lucozade bottles to something as huge as visiting my mother in St. Brendan’s Psychiatric Hospital. I, too, grew up around water, the Royal Canal. That canal, just as the River Liffey here, left an indelible mark on my psyche. Much of the suffering, disappointment, and harrowing sense of abandonment in these pages also resonated. For my tastes, the novel perhaps ended on too neat a note. However, to Ni­ Chonchair’s great credit, long after I turned the last page, I’m still thinking about this tragic family. I worry for them, especially for the burdened, feisty, and sensitive child narrator. I also hope hard.