Editorial Confessional

Dear Great Editor in the Sky, forgive us, for we have sinned.

It has been, well, a considerable amount of time since our last confession.

We have been consumed by envy as we read the amazing writing in other magazines. We have been gluttonous in reading almost anything we can get our hands on. We briefly prayed (sorry to abuse the privilege!) to the God of Printing Presses   so the next issue of that one magazine couldn’t be published. We also planned some stealth attacks on a few ISPs. We didn’t think any of our dastardly deeds would work. We are appalled by our behavior and we are even more appalled that we would do it again.

We have harbored unkind thoughts toward writers. We know it was spiteful to take out that billboard in Times Square that read, “Submitting more than once a week = NOT OKAY,” but we also felt it important to get the message out. It was equally ill-advised to take out the full page ad in several local newspapers indicating that stories with more than 5,000 words would be rejected unread. In our defense, subtlety wasn’t working.

We are human and sometimes weak. We gave in to wrath after the umpteenth writer sent us a new version of a story we had already accepted. We took a knife to a stack of printer paper. It was not, we admit, a pretty sight. There were sad little shreds of paper everywhere. We tried to clean up the mess. We recycled and made a pinata. No stories or poems were hurt. We should get credit for that.

We’d like you to reconsider your position on lust. Is it really a bad thing?   We will own up to lusting for a book and movie deal like the one Shane Jones got and richly-deserved. We cannot detail the other lustful acts we have committed.   We do not want the library to come tumbling down around us. We’re thinking of you, Great Editor in the Sky. We aim to keep your house holy. Also, your guardians here on earth, the mighty librarians, would get angry so we would be forcing them, in turn, to commit a sin. It’s a vicious cycle.

We’re holding a contest. The exchange of money is involved and we intend to pay the winners handsomely as they also richly deserve. We do not apologize for our greed, not one little bit. We understand there might be some extra penance for this one.

As we read the August issue of PANK [featuring writing from Matthew J. Babcock, Mel Bosworth, J. Bradley, Eric Burke, Nicelle Davis, Errid Farland, Erin Fitzgerald, Craig Greenman, Kevin Griffith, BJ Hollars and Brendan Todt, Alexandra Isacson, Jason Jordan, Peter Levine, Sandee Lyles, Kuzhali Manickavel, Steven McDermott, Lylanne Musselman, Valerie O’Riordan, Garrett Socol and Jared Walls] we were flush with pride. And how could we not be? Do you see those names? Have you read their words? We know pride is sinful but have we not the right to be proud?

Go. Read. Enjoy. Let us know what you think.

2009 Best of Net Nominations

It’s nomination season and we’ll be nominating for Best American Short Stories, Dzanc’s Best of Web, the Pushcart and Best of Net. We’ll also be spreading the love as far and widely as we can.

Our nominees for Best of the Net 2009 are:

Poetry
Penelope Waits for Her Wandering Lover, Catherine Zickgraf
https://www.pankmagazine.com/read/zickgraf.html

There are Women at the Shipyard, Caitlin Johnson
https://www.pankmagazine.com/read/johnson2.html

Sleep Corrupts Her, Lauren Wheeler
https://www.pankmagazine.com/read/wheeler.html

Missing Isadore, Brad Johnson
https://www.pankmagazine.com/read/johnson.html

Sleeping With Robin Hood, Stephen Mills
https://www.pankmagazine.com/read/mills.html

The Four Things I’d Do, Peter Schwartz
https://www.pankmagazine.com/read/schwartz.html

Fiction
Missy, Tania Hershman
https://www.pankmagazine.com/read/hershman.html

Fugitives, Tim Jones-Yelvington
https://www.pankmagazine.com/read/yelvington.html

All News is Good News

RIP John Hughes. Breakfast Club is the best primer on writing dialogue, ever.

An interesting interview series that offers 10 Questions for Poetry editors. In this installment, Mary Biddinger, editor of the Barn Owl Review.

A note to writers about making their deadlines.

If you pull a literary hoax and no one notices, have you really pulled a literary hoax?

This has nothing to do with writing, but a reporter got to see the Netflix processing center which would be like, a dream come true for me, so read about it.

Jim Baen’s Universe is closing with the April 2010 issue.

Books as flirtation (or is that flotation?) devices.

What rejections mean.

An Emerging Writers Fellowship.

Read, Write, Poem.

Support Emma Straub.

Seven Lies About Lying.

The winner of NPR’s Three Minute Fiction contest was announced.

PANK contributor Laura Marello is now reviewing books for Examiner.

Daniel Nester, another PANK contributor,   has a book forthcoming accompanied by an amusing website. Check it out.

Hint Fiction editor Robert Swartwood reports on the first week of submissions for his forthcoming Norton Hint Fiction anthology.

J.A. Tyler has redesigned the mud luscious site and it’s pretty.

Rocco Landesman will serve as the new chairman for the National Endowment for the Arts.

The AWP 2010 schedule is shaping up. Some see us at our panel and visit us at the Bookfair.

Bad news for short story collections?

Ask the Editor: Jensen Whelan, Hobart (Web) Editor

In this week’s Ask the Editor, we talk to Jensen Whelan, Web Editor for Hobart. He talks to us about international intrigue, parenthood, his amazing ability to effect social change, the brilliance of the spork, and the Internet as the modern televisual device.

1. You lived in Sweden for a time and now you’re back in the states, living in Massachusetts. Same sex marriage is legal in both places. Are you responsible for this progress? What was the most interesting aspect of living in Sweden? What do you miss?

Thanks for noticing my efforts. Apart from the same sex weddings I was going to all the time, the best part about living in Sweden was learning a new language. I’m a total foreign language nerd. I was that kid in high school whose idea of a fun after school activity was declension worksheets with the German Club. I was and still am a total geek. Otherwise, I liked almost everything about living in Sweden. Except for the darkness. I do not like the darkness. What do I miss? Universal Healthcare, a functioning social welfare system and the band Europe. On a serious note, my wife and I are very happy and fortunate to be able to raise our sons in places like Sweden and Massachusetts, where tolerance and progress are normal parts of the cultural experience.

2. How is the literary scene in Sweden?

I don’t really know. The writing community in the US is really energetic and dynamic and I never experienced anything like that in Sweden. To be fair, though, I never looked for it as I put so much of my effort into being part of the community in the English-speaking part of the world. Literature is enormously popular in Sweden, even English-language literature—I’ve seen some great readings/events. Richard Ford came two years ago and the guy introducing him choked up a little during the introduction he was so excited. Obviously, being so close to the UK, a lot of British literature is popular. It was kind of cool to be exposed to writers I might have otherwise missed. I’m thinking of people like Scarlett Thomas, Lloyd Jones (although he’s Kiwi), Sarah Waters, etc. But the scene here, as far as I can tell, remains pretty well rooted in the establishment in the sense that there are very few independent publishers and that kind of thing. I mean, Sweden awards the Nobel Prize, so the cultural norm is more Toni Morrison than (who would be a good example here?) David Foster Wallace.

3. What do you look for in Hobart (Web) submissions?

I look first for hugeness of heart. Stories that are funny and generous and willing to engage the world in odd and wonderful ways have a good chance of hitting with me. I also look for language that gets into my writing DNA, makes me want to keep reading and then stop reading and go write. The best example I can think of from our archives is Glen Pourciau’s “Belly“. This story is just right in so many ways.

4. What are the biggest flaws you find in submissions?

There are two things that will guarantee a rejection at Hobart Web when I’m reading for an issue. 1) Unfamiliarity with the kind of stuff we publish. I feel like I see this a lot from editors in interviews, but it’s really true: submit to magazines and journals you love to read. Finding a good fit for a story in a magazine is an important part of the process. Though as a writer, I understand how difficult this is. It’s hard to look at the range of work we’ve published and then define a “Hobart story,” and I love to be proved wrong when it comes to my own sort of preconceived ideas about what’s right for Hobart Web and what’s not. I guess I didn’t really say much there. And 2) A lack of completion. A lot of the stories I read just don’t seem fully realized or ready to go out yet. Maybe this is because they are too new or something. It often feels like the story was going along just fine, then it took a wrong turn, maybe two sentences synthesized in some predictable or boring way and the story went where it shouldn’t have, ending on the wrong note. I don’t know.

5.  Other than PANK, what is your favorite magazine?

I do love PANK. Also Hobart, of course. Opium, Monkeybicycle, Quick Fiction, NOON, Avery Anthology, Spork, Wigleaf, elimae, Tin House, Pindeldyboz, Night Train, Smokelong, Ninth Letter, Keyhole, Gulf Coast. I recently discovered some online journals that publish longer fiction that so far has been really, really good: Waccamaw, Freight Stories, Bull: Men’s Fiction, Avatar Review. There are so many others. I can’t wait for the Collagist to launch. (ed. Neither can we!)

6. How has your editorial work influenced your writing?

Enormously. Getting to read good writing is always inspiring. Also, getting to read work that I feel is not great helps me identify bad habits and bad choices in my own stuff. Reading twenty stories in a row in which the narrator keeps popping out of the story’s action to editorialize what’s happening or what a character is thinking has helped me understand how easy it is to fall into this trap and to, hopefully, avoid doing so. I think editing has also helped me be able to separate in a way from my work once a draft is completed, to be able to see where a story is working and where it’s not without feeling too close to a particular paragraph or sentence. I’m able to be more ruthless with my stuff now in a way that I couldn’t before.

7. Hobart (Web) and and PANK meet at a bar, have drinks, hit it off. Do they a. go to a sleazy motel and have a one night stand or b. make out in the bar but leave it at that or c. exchange phone numbers, start dating, and live happily ever after? Show your math.

Definitely A. But only if by “sleazy motel” we mean the Hyatt and by “one night stand” we mean a good night’s sleep in a comfy bed and my sons are not there. This makes me sound like I’m fifty or something.

8. How do you and your co-editor Andrea Kneeland come to a consensus on which pieces to publish? Or do you each take turns from month to month? Is anyone else involved in the Hobart (Web) editorial process?

We read on a month-to-month basis. Sometimes a story will come in (often near the end of the month) that is so great it gets passed on to the next editor for consideration if an issue is full or the piece just doesn’t fit with the other three or so pieces in the issue. Andrea has just joined Team Hobart and I’m really excited to see her first issue. I’m a big fan of her work and know she’ll put together a great group of stories. Who else? Aaron Burch is the Boss. He founded Hobart and still edits the print edition. He is a truly amazing editor with a great eye for people on their way places (Pasha Malla, Jeff Parker, Roy Kesey, etc.) and has put together increasingly awesome issues. Number 10 is just out and looks badass. Often he’ll send along shorter stuff that is better suited to the word counts of the Internet. I’ve taken a lot of these stories. Like I said, Aaron has great taste. Matthew Simmons is the interviews editor. The interviews are one of my favorite parts of Hobart online. Ryan Molloy is the photo editor. Every month we send him our stories and he picks photos to complement the work. He’s also a great designer who did the Hobart Ann Arbor reading poster (which can be seen on the blog. Sean Carmen, who used to be the photo editor, takes care of the blog.

9. What has been the most valuable part of the MFA experience? Has there been any part of the experience that was less than ideal?

At UMass I’ve been lucky enough to work with Chris Bachelder, Noy Holland and Sabina Murray, three writers whose work I loved even before I came here. I honestly think it’s going to take me a few years of decompression to understand all that I have learned so far from these three (not to mention poetry classes and workshops I’ll be taking from Jim Tate, Dara Weir and Peter Gizzi). Apart from just being able to have the ear, so to speak, of writers of this caliber and ask (more than likely) lame questions, the biggest benefit for me has been community. I’ve been fortunate to find some great friends so far and some generous and brilliant readers of my work. I’m also really digging the teaching we get to do and the classes we get to take. On the downside: the constant criticism that MFA programs get for the dreaded “MFA story” doesn’t come from nowhere. My program works hard to discourage this type of writing—the three writers I mentioned above hardly write what might be called traditional MFA fiction—but workshops do have a tendency to want to iron out the most interesting wrinkles and turns in a story. But overall, I’m pleased with the experience. You don’t enter an MFA program to learn how to write; you go to learn how to do it better. Three years of basically cost-free time to learn from a bunch of great young writers and our professors is not a bad thing.

10. I enjoyed your piece Training Exercise in Spork and found it very moving.  How does fatherhood inform your writing? Is the spork perhaps the best food conveyance device ever invented?

Thanks for the kinds words, Roxane! Yes, the spork is the best food conveyance ever invented. Obviously.

Fatherhood informs my writing quite a bit. I think it’s because there is an emotional texture in a story about fatherhood that I just understand and am able to then take places I couldn’t otherwise. I don’t write much about, say, bars or being young and living in New York because those things aren’t my reality. That said, it’s not like I sit down every morning and say I’m going to knock off another father story. I often just find that those are the sentences that are coming out.

11. What happened to the Journal of Modern Post?

It died. I was not very good at running my own journal. I knew nothing about design and html and that stuff, but I liked doing JoMP. As you know, editing and publishing takes a ton of energy. Right around the time JoMP died, I was entering my master’s program in Sweden, had a kid and just found that it was either that or my own writing. Of course, right around then Aaron asked me to join the web-editing team and I couldn’t say no.

12. Are you a fan of form rejection letters or personal rejection letters or do you think we should turn to the use of something more reliable such as the use of pigeons to deliver information to writers?

I like to be as personal as I can. Often I don’t have time to be, but I try to at least include a small note to the writer telling them to submit again or suggesting places I think might be better suited to a particular story. I think it’s important as an editor to read a story on its own terms. In other words, just because I think a story should be put together a certain way doesn’t mean that’s right. I mean, if I knew so much about it, my own stories would be accepted all the time, right? If there is something I feel strongly about—say a fix or two that would make the story great—I’ll suggest it. But if the only thing “wrong” with a story is that it just doesn’t feel right for Hobart, chances are the writer knows what he or she is doing and will place the story eventually. I often seen stories I reject published in other journals, which I used to think reflected poorly on me, but now think just means that once a writer hits a certain point in her development its only a matter of editors’ taste that determines where a story finds a home.

13. What are you working on right now?

Right now I’m a little more than half-way through a collection of short fiction. I’m also just wrapping up a chapbook manuscript (which includes “Training Exercise” and some other fatherhood stories and for some reason, lots of stories in which birds play some kind of part) that I’m hoping to be able to submit to upcoming contests, etc. this fall. I’ve been trying to take submitting and (hopefully) publishing a little more seriously than I have, getting my work out there and figuring out which journals I fit best with. Just this morning Avery Anthology took a story, I’m happy to say. So maybe, hopeful, I’m starting to figure things out in small ways.

14. What is your favorite trash television show?

I know this sounds obnoxious, but I don’t have a TV. BUT! I do watch a lot of stuff on the Internet. Netflix, Hulu, etc. I love me a good (but historically dubious!) “documentary” on the History channel. My wife tells me this is something only old men are into, but I don’t care. Sometimes you just want to know what really happened to Hitler or why the UFOs landed in ancient Egypt and built the pyramids.

15. What question should we have asked?

The answer is beer.

Friday Five: The “R” Edition

1. Read: Aaron Burch, How To

2. Reminisce & RIP: John Hughes, The Formative Years. In Memoriam, a giveaway: The Too Cool For School John Hughes Collection. Leave a comment about which Breakfast Club character you like best and why. Winner will be chosen randomly at the end of the day!

3. Rejoice: Ice Creams Around the World (via the Rumpus)

4.Repent: Actually, I just wanted to throw that in there because the word repent is a fine fine word. It starts off quite mildly but then rises into a hard hissed”p” and after that comes the hellfire and brimstone of the “ent”. If there isn’t spittle involved, if you aren’t a little flushed and sweaty, if your heart isn’t beating a lot faster after the utterance of the word, you’re doing it wrong.

5. Return: Monday, for an excellent interview with Jensen Whelan, Hobart (Web) editor.

An Attitude of Gratitude

We are grateful for:

Our print subscribers: You are awesome.   Sometimes, you buy a PDF or a single issue or a Kindle issue or a three year subscription. However you support us, you believe in us enough to give us money that makes it possible for us to mail our issues out and buy envelopes and print postcards and all kinds of things.

Our online audience: Thank you for supporting our writers by reading their work and for reading this simple blog and for spreading the good word, wide and far.

Our contributors: You send us your writing and let us publish it and you understand that even though we want, sincerely, to compensate as you so richly deserve, we as of yet cannot. You send us work that surprises and amuses and challenges and shocks and frightens us. You trust that we will treat your work with love and respect . That’s awesome.

Your Blogs and Twitter Feeds: If you mention your blog in your cover letter, we add it to our Google Reader feed. Then we read your blog rolls so we can get to know your friends but not in a stalkerish way. And then we get to learn about where you’re publishing other work and what (and who) you love and what you hate and what you need and what you’ve lost. You give us ideas for blog posts, and news items for our weekly news posts. Sometimes you give us a shout out (holla!) and we appreciate that too. Sometimes you give us things to think about. Sometimes you make us laugh and sometimes you frustrate us. It is all a much needed reminder that we are not alone here.

Your patience as we learn and grow and stumble and get back up.

It’s Thursday. The week is almost over. Feel free to share your the things you’re grateful for in the comments!

Shark Week

Poets.org has compiled some shark poems in honor of the best of all weeks, Shark Week!

I am pretty obsessed with this idea of Shark Week. It started as a special on the Discovery Channel in 1987 and now it’s this pop culture phenomenon where other networks and entities are getting in on the shark fun. I read an article that said, “Shark week is back!” as if we had all been waiting, breathlessly for more trivial, yet important information about sharks and their general habits.

Why does something like Shark Week exist? Speculate in the comments.

In Today’s News…

Congratulations to PANK contributor Kelly Davio who has been selected for Best New Poets 2009.

Dzanc Books is looking for interns.

New issues of Frigg, Letterbox, Rumble, Ghoti, Wigleaf, The Chapbook Review, Danse Macabre, Dispatch Litareview, Sub-Lit, Open Letters, elimae, The Short Review, decomP, and Knee Jerk.

The Booker longlist has been announced.

Americca, by Aimee Bender, is available online at Tin House.

I know the wait for Glee to start is agonizing, but this might hold you over.

A really interesting essay on pricing E-books.

Advice to the poets attending the 2009 National Poetry Slam.

News about the next Spork.

LibraryThing is looking for a Maine-based PHP hacker.

Six ways writers can use Facebook to promote their work.

A nice essay concerning Amazon’s reach.

And Amazon is getting sued for some bad behavior regarding the Kindle.

Identity Theory is looking for a new assistant fiction editor.

Richard Nash looks back and forth.

An interview with Jon Fullmer of Knee Jerk Magazine.

Another book cover white-washed?

You can now advertise on HTML Giant.

Need some web design? Check out Supreme Value.

The Hint Fiction anthology is accepting submissions through 8/31.

Some MFA students are blogging.

The Guardian’s Summer Short Story special.

Matt Bell’s The Collectors is now available as a PDF.

The 2009 winners for the Canteen Awards in Poetry and Fiction have been annnounced.

An interview with Tina May Hall.

A service that will help you apply to MFA programs. Discussion ensues. And one member of the service responds. Then there is this commentary. Interesting stuff.

Ask the Editor: Gary Percesepe, Associate Editor, Mississippi Review

Today we talk to Gary Percesepe, Associate Editor of the wonderful Mississippi Review about the spirituality of writing, Obama’s mom jeans, and the stories that give us gut reactions.

1. What is it like serving as an editor for such a venerable publication as the Mississippi Review? Is your magazine’s reputation ever intimidating as an editor? Corollary: Do you spell out Mississippi the way most people learned in grade school, by sounding out the letters slowly?

When you talk about the Mississippi Review there are two words to remember: Frederick Barthelme, the Executive Editor. He is the finest lit mag editor I have ever known, and what little I know about editing and writing I learned from him (and Nolan Miller at the Antioch Review). It’s true that the Mississippi Review has a sterling reputation, and that’s a reflection of Barthelme’s vision, his aesthetic, his artfulness and sly humor and unfailing sense of style and verve. He’s all heart. I’d like to say that all of my fellow editors and staff work in his shadow but he throws no shadow. Barthelme basically invented the online literary journal, way early on the web, and he has created a program where the online and print versions are symbiotic. From the start, MR online offered original stories and poems and essays, and didn’t just use the Web site as a teaser ad for the print magazine. This has turned out to be the right idea. Also, Rick never thought of online and print magazines as different kinds of things, just magazines in different packages. I realize that writers aspire to appear in the print issue, and that’s understandable, but the irony is that the MR online version gets read by far more people—it’s not even close. We get something on the order of a four hundred thousand visits a year, one and a half million hits; we “serve” nine hundred thousand files. That’s putting more writing into more hands than we ever could with the print version. It’s a pretty common thing for a young writer to get contacted by a New York literary agent after appearing in either version of the magazine—it just happened the other day, again.

Lo, these many years later, my fingers still occasionally err when tapping out Mississippi, even though I lived for a time on the river, in Saint Louis. Yeah, the childhood song helps, when I get stuck. Like “30 Days Hath September, April June and November”””I love that. I love it when I get to say “hath” in public.

2. What are you looking for as you consider submissions to the Mississippi Review? What is the biggest flaw you find in submissions?

When we put out the call for stories for the Summer 2007 fiction issue, here’s what I wrote:

“What are we looking for? Characters we can care about. Some weather, maybe. Dialogue that’s spot on and never tiresome. Stories that engage our senses and make us feel things, maybe break our hearts.”

“As always when we read, we seek the problematic, the troublesome, the curious, the ill-fitting, the remarkable and the mundane, work that stays with us after we read it, work that challenges our tastes and imaginations, our spirits. We thank you for your help in sending this work our way.”

As for the biggest flaw, well, for me it is writers not able to get to the point in the first paragraph. I mean, set it up. The first paragraph is not too soon. I’ve got to be in love by page one, or at least feel flirted with, or it’s not going to work out. I’ve been greatly helped (both as a writer and an editor) by something Barthleme wrote a while back called “39 Steps.” I wouldn’t add a word to this classic advice. You can read it here.

3. How do you pronounce your last name? I like it. It reminds me of precipice and parapet, both good words.

Hey, Roxane, you’re the one with the great name! I always want to sing that name. (ed. Thanks. I like my name, and I used to hate the song, but now I like it too. There’s a lot to love about a song about a woman of the night.)

I do like my name. Percesepe is Italian. We are a small clan, from the Abruzzi region north of Rome in Italia, and scattered in New York, California, Florida, and me here in Ohio. What’s odd is that I am the only one called by this name, “Gary John Percesepe,” in the entire universe. When I was a kid, knowing this, it made me feel simultaneously special and lonely.

The Anglo version is pronounced purr-seh-sep-pe. If you are a paisan you may pronounce it pair-che-sep (roll the r).

I like both those words too, precipice, parapet. I have a memoir in progress; the working title is “Somewhere to Fall From,” as in precipice, parapet.

4. Other than PANK, what is your favorite magazine?

Too numerous to mention.

5. You’re an ordained minister. Do you currently lead a ministry? What is that work like?

I serve a church in the Protestant orbit known as the UCC. We keep the protest in Protestant, or what theologian Paul Tillich called “the spirit of Protestantism.” We sometimes joke that UCC stands for “Unitarians Considering Christ,” but it’s really the United Church of Christ. You can check us out at www.ucc.org We gave you Jeremiah Wright and Barack Obama last year. They’re both ours, along with about 1.2 million other folk. Trinity UCC in Chicago, where all this drama played out, is one of our larger churches, a “destination church” where you’d receive a warm welcome and extravagant hospitality. That’s true of most of our churches, including the one that I serve in Springfield, Ohio. I’m very proud of the UCC. We are a denomination of “firsts” (going back in New England to the Pilgrims), as in first to ordain women (back in the 1800s), first to ordain LGBT folk, first to marry LGBT folk. Last year in the wake of the Obama’s Philadelphia speech on race, “Toward a More Perfect Union,” we initiated a “sacred conversation on race in America,” which now seems very timely, considering the latest dustup with Skip Gates in Cambridge, and the President’s perceptive comments in his press conference, which will now release more kookiness among the kooky, but will also afford an opportunity for engaging structural and systemic racism, which—along with the genocide of Native peoples– is America’s original sin.

The work is exhilarating and heartbreaking. One of my congregants died today, a woman named Helen who was 101 years old. I visited her in the hospital on Sunday and she was in terrible pain. She had fallen, and had broken her shoulder, her arm and her wrist. I held her hand and prayed with her, and she managed a smile afterwards and told me that she was losing the will to go on. She was very honest about it. I didn’t know what to say to that, so I took my hand and placed it lightly on her forehead and made the sign of the cross on her forehead. I could feel her slipping away, transitioning, moving on. She was almost 102 years old but she was traveling faster than me. A lot of this work is learning to let go. And of course, there is the grinding poverty in neighborhoods like mine, and the ongoing struggle for justice and peace, speaking truth to power and walking alongside the powerless. Preaching on Sunday mornings is a kind of performance art. It means, if I do nothing else, that I write 1,500 words a week.

6. Does your spirituality influence your writing and editorial work? How?

Yes.

Every story or poem is a kind of prayer. Every act of reading is a kind of listening to prayers offered.

7. The Mississippi Review and PANK meet at a bar, have drinks, hit it off. Do they a. go to a sleazy motel and have a one night stand or b. make out in the bar but leave it at that or c. behave chastely, exchange phone numbers, start dating, and live happily ever after? Show your math.

We don’t have enough money for the motel.

8. As someone who is committed to activism, what role does creative writing play in creating and sustaining change?

The Catholic activist Dorothy Day said that our problems stem from our acceptance of this filthy rotten system, by which she meant an oppressive social structure of domination that locks in inequalities and injustices and keeps people feeling powerless to change things. I firmly believe that there are entrenched “systems of domination” in the world—economic, political, cultural, media, religious—and the task of art, or at least, one of the tasks of art, is to engage with those systems. Not necessarily directly. In fact, direct engagement, a la the Sartre program, is probably a mistake, as it too becomes oppressive. But I think what happens is that artists work on the slant side of things– always indirectly, always creatively, to poke fun, raise questions, crack jokes, sing counterpoint to, open fissures, and reveal the truth about the Empire, which is that the emperor, now as before, has no clothes. The Jesus that most interests me is the radical Jesus, a Jewish Mediterranean peasant, probably illiterate, who with sly peasant humor (“It is easier for a camel to go through a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven”) deconstructed the Domination System of his day. I think that Jesus overturning the tables of the moneychangers in the Temple was the first interactive performance art, and certainly the first recorded act of civil disobedience. What I’m saying here is not new–art has always empowered people to resist systems that they find oppressive, and Beauty is the truest form of protest.

9. The Mississippi Review no longer accepts unsolicited work for print issues. How do you compile print issues now?

For the last print fiction issue that I edited (the Summer 2007 issue you mentioned) we solicited work using MR online, and ran stories there as well as in the print issue, alongside stories that I had solicited from writers that I admired, like Ann Beattie, John Barth, Rick Moody, Mary Grimm, John Holman, and others. I was delighted at the wonderful work that came in unsolicited, including terrific stories from Kim Chinquee, Jeff Landon, Mary Miller, and others.

This year we’re running two contests, the MR Prize is a fiction and poetry contest and the MR Poetry Series Book Contest is a poetry book contest.

We are discussing what we will be doing next year. Perhaps the same thing, perhaps one contest and one by invitation only issue.

10. In your introduction to the Summer 2007 Fiction Issue, you talked about having a gut reaction to a story in the slush pile. What’s the last story you read that gave you that gut reaction?

A few come to mind.

Shot Girls by Kim Chinqee

Even the Interstate is Pretty by Mary Miller

Lifelike Baby Girls by Jeff Landon

All three of those stories came in cold, not “agented” but sent in response to a call for stories that we posted online. More recently, it happened with stories by Carrie Spell and Andy Plattner, featured in the current MR online issue.

11. In a couple of places, I’ve read about how you learned to read and consider submissions. How has your approach evolved over the years?

Nolan Miller taught me a lot when I worked as a fiction editor at the Antioch Review years ago. Nolan had been a brilliant novelist—he had been tagged as the “next Hemingway” as a young man– and later he was a terrific teacher at Antioch. The poet Mark Strand and “Twilight Zone” creator & writer Rod Serling were among his many students. Nolan gave me a tutorial in how to read submissions, and how to be a fiction editor. We used the slush as our raw material. I have written about it here.

As to how my approach has evolved over the years, well, I’m not sure it has. I’ve certainly adapted it, as I read much more stuff online now, and submissions are sent to us electronically. If anything, I find that I have less patience with writing that isn’t good. I suppose my impatience has grown in response to the sheer volume of submissions, which can be overwhelming. In the current MR online fiction issue my colleagues and I devised a scheme whereby we placed submissions into two categories: no and maybe. Later, we went through the maybes, adding a “probably” category for the stories that we eventually published.

12. Is mentoring within the writing and editing community a dying practice? How can we encourage more mentorship between experienced writers and editors and those who are up and coming?

At the Mississippi Review we’ve revived an old practice where established writers “introduce” younger or “emerging” writers. We did this in the Summer 2007 Fiction issue that I have mentioned. I asked Ann Beattie and T.C. Boyle, among others, to give me a name of one of their most promising students. This is how I met Hannah Pittard , one of Ann’s students, whose work I admire. We did this again in the “Lit Mag at 100″ print issue that I did with Travis Kurowski. In that issue, we did an “Editor’s Roundtable” with a fascinating group of editors from McSweeneys, Antioch Review, Missouri Review, N + 1, Hobart, New York Quarterly, and New Ohio Review, asking them to recommend a young or emerging writer whose work they particularly admired, and we published a story or poem from each. As I recall, I asked Rick Moody to contribute someone as well.

I’m quite fond of a website called Fictionaut where writers and editors can invite promising writers to submit their work. Fictionaut is the creation of another MR associate editor, Jurgen Fauth. I like the way James Robison (a Fictionaut contributor) describes the site: “A community of trusted and truthful writers who will encourage, or discourage, one’s efforts. Such a place is a luxury. A graduate’s graduate writing program which, if found, is a site to be treasured, no less.” Robison goes on to say, “Writing into a void is miserable, like telling jokes to a wall. Fictionaut provides a round-the-clock, faithfully attentive audience. Bless its founders.” Amen.
As Jurgen says, Fictionaut brings the social web to literary fiction, connecting readers and writers through a community network that doubles as self ¬selecting magazine highlighting the most exciting short stories, poetry, flash fiction, and novel excerpts.

Fictionaut is still in a private, beta testing phase, but you can request an invitation here.

(ed. Fictionaut is indeed a wonderful, wonderful place. We have one invite if you’re interested in joining. Let us know in the comments.)

13. Obama’s mom jeans. National crisis or irrelevant?

Irrelevant. The crisis is that we’ve got fifty million people without health insurance, two wars a goin’ and foreclosures all over the land. Children in Haiti are so hungry they are eating dirt. California and Ohio are broke, just to name a few states where draconian budget cuts will hurt the most vulnerable among us. We got idiot TV news people and only one Jon Stewart to go around, debunking. Though if the Prez had asked me I would have hooked him up with some vintage black Girbaud jeans with a beeper pocket, and black high top Chuck Taylors. (Aside: I just got back from seeing “Funny People” where Leslie Mann wears the ultimate mom jeans.)

14. What’s your favorite TV show?

The Yankees on YES (I am from the Bronx). My sole concession to Empire.

15. What question(s) should I have asked?

Question: How’s your novel in progress. What’s it called?

Answer: “Leaving Telluride.” Don’t ask. (ed. We look forward to reading it!)

Snuggie Poems!

We had six truly amazing entries to our Snuggie poem contest! The entries are below for you Snuggie enjoyment. The winner (randomly drawn using a very complex methodology) is Teresa Houle. Teresa, you lucky lady, e-mail your mailing address to awesome at pankmagazine dot com and we’ll dispatch your prize forthwith! Thanks for playing. We’ll do this again some time next month.

untitled

Who is the moron that invented the Snuggie?
It’s a fleece-tent with sleeves,
I thought they were kidding me.

Is our society so torpid?
Yet, bursting with cash?
That we will buy anything,
That warms our white ass?

The new designs are out;
I can look like a zebra
While I flick my clicker
And watch some more Oprah.

And don’t get me started on Snuggie for dogs,
Anyone who buys that deserves to be flogged.

“”Teresa Houle

The Zebra-print Snuggie

So much depends
upon

a zebra-print
snuggie

glazed with Cheeto
dust

beside the TV
remote

(with massive apologies to WCW)

—Ryan Bradley

“The Truth About Satan”

The reason he was
kicked out of Heaven —
not because of rebellion —
but because he tried to
steal God’s Snuggie.

—Robert Swartwood

Ample Praise

Snuggie, sweet Snuggie,
We need you, you see,
In times of insecurity.
Old people love you.
The unemployed, too.
Your animal prints
Make us think of the zoo.

Your presence is growing
Your future is bright
Illuminated by a book light.
You’re on the TV,
on Twitter, in dorms.
Everyone cool
uses you to keep warm.

Snuggie, dear Snuggie,
You leave my hands free
To eat popcorn and candy
And drink cold sweet tea.
All this lounging is fun but
it’s driving me nuts—
I’m starting to look
like Jaba the Hut.

Linda

untitled

Gigantic Gerberbabies in beanbag onesies

Season eleventy of Lost

Fingerprints now Cheetocrust cheesescapes, fingers more cheese than meat, but more sodium than cheese (immortality imminent)

but Does Contain Milk Products (thank the Lord)

Underneath, tracksuit and key lime crocs—in case of fire

My zebra-striped sausage casing can’t hold in the Friday night fun

—Jeremy “Snuggiemaster” Brooks

untitled

forgetting how to hug
we wrap ourselves in cheap polyester
clinging to lost memories
of fireplaces, loved ones

the product of countless
toxic fumes, exploitation, disaster
the blanket with sleeves
pretends to be a friend

only to steal everything
that ever matters

—Martha